On 17.01.25 16:52, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > Did anyone ever suggest or put pressure on the C++ standard committee to add > strong unscoped enums?
Someone did: // https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/69zWsoGP9 enum class Strong { One, Two, Three }; #ifdef __cpp_using_enum using enum Strong; #else inline constexpr auto One = Strong::One; inline constexpr auto Two = Strong::Two; inline constexpr auto Three = Strong::Three; #endif use(One); use(Two); use(Three); The ice for unscoped enums becomes _very_ thin. -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> (he/his) Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
