On Saturday 3 February 2024 09:08:25 GMT-7 Thiago Macieira wrote: > The compiler is pretty buggy and has several, unfixed conformance issues > with C++. > > One year ago I asked on the interest mailing list about using a non-latest > MSVC: > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2023-January/038859.html
Sigh. This is getting old. I'll just link to the build report. https://testresults.qt.io/logs/qt/qtbase/ b52675aef6269af0476d90a1fc35facd94699813/ WindowsWindows_10_22H2x86_64WindowsWindows_10_22H2x86_64MSVC2019qtci- windows-10_22H2- x86_64-52-4eb878DoNotCompileTestsDuringBuild_MinimalStaticTests_Sccache_UseConfigure/ 50b36f3d2b221f9b38f52c51b9dd68fdb22c7810/build_1725051643/log.txt.gz You can now choose: 64-bit QFlags or MSVC 2019. I don't think it's worth keeping compatibility with the old moc way of doing things for a now 5-year- old compiler. More to the point, I refuse to do the work to even attempt to work around the issue. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
