On 5/21/21 2:49 PM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
Please don't cut half of what I said to make me say something I did not say.
I did not do that at all. I merely quoted what I wanted to answer.
You said that during Trolltech times that Qt Windows was commercial only and the open source part was under GPL (not LGPL).
Sorry for not having been clearer. I wrote that the open source part of the *dual* *license* was GPL. The Windows port, however, was only commercially licensed, not dually. Due to a crystal ball shortage, I cannot respond to the rest. Cheers, Joerg _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
