On Wednesday, 28 October 2020 01:15:33 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2020, at 08:37, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2020 17:34:44 CET Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> Have we fixed it? > >> > >> I do not plan on updating qtchooser for Qt 6. Qt 6 should not install any > >> binary with the same name as Qt 5 did. > > > > Do we need to change the default name of moc and uic then? > > The solution we have with qtchooser works also for Qt 6 for those > applications. Is there a reason to change this?
qtchooser is EOL and should not be used for Qt 6. The solution for Qt 6 must not use it. See the problem statement as I outlined in the email to Shawn. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
