Yes. QNX 7.1 is based on GCC 8.
On 2020-07-23, 5:03 PM, "Development on behalf of Ville Voutilainen"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 23 July 2020 12:34:06 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > I think the primary environment where a transition and resulting BC
> > breakage would be annoying is the Linux system environment with gcc.
This
> > is where Olivier’s solution is quite elegant IMO.
>
> I'd rather go to [[no_unique_address]] instead of this. The extension
doesn't
> compile in all cases (you can't have a Flexible Array Member everywhere)
and
> is going to produce warnings.
>
> Let's just drop GCC 8.
Does that also drop QNX?
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.qt-2Dproject.org_listinfo_development&d=DwIGaQ&c=yzoHOc_ZK-sxl-kfGNSEvlJYanssXN3q-lhj0sp26wE&r=HB7_zq-d1V3WeAdNGC_by-Ou7WOmkfxFMKVYxGfHYTs&m=r18UENxUZTmc76lNsEaKZHWxuRz8_WqA1QHOOv4pzp0&s=VJjTNtXQ7lCGy8n1vheFyE79PiQeQcPJ1dHOSsLYh9I&e=
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
