Hi, this time it is only relevant to aarch64, as I imported it from glibc without recognizing that I should have removed it.
best regards Waldemar > On 28. Feb 2018, at 11:34, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@bootlin.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > >> On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:07:33 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: >> >> I noticed a failure while compiling eudev against uClibc-ng 1.0.28 on >> aarch64: it detected name_to_handle_at being declared in the header but >> then failed to link because it is not implemented in uClibc-ng. >> >> Patch attached. > > A quick heads up on this: it is by far not the first time that I see > uClibc headers having the prototype for a given function, and not the > actual implementation of this function. > > It is confusing, and sometimes causes problems when just an autoconf > compile test is done, and not an autoconf link test. > > Shouldn't this be fixed globally ? > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://bootlin.com > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
