Hi Eugene,
Eugene Yudin wrote,

> Yes. In that particular case loop iterates through en_US (from buildroot),
> en_US and en_GB.
> Of cause, that list can be patched but I don't know if that's correct.
> It's look a bit strange if user passes locale which actually absent.
> 
> Waldemar, what you think about it?
> 
> I made several tests with different locales (en_US, en_GB, ru_RU, C.UTF-8 and
> C).
> The generated header is the same for all the above locale except pure C.
> 
> Comment in the same makefile tells about problem with some locales.
> I think it would be better to use C locale for fallback.
> 
> I attached the tested patch to modify fallback behavior based on Arnout draft.
> I also changed the order of calls to raise priority of C.UTF-8 locale.

Looks good to me. First trying the user configured locale (.UTF-8)
and if it does not exist fallback to C.UTF-8.

Not sure if we should do configured locale (en_US.UTF-8) then
C.UTF_8 and then even C, when C doesn't build workable output?

best regards
 Waldemar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@uclibc-ng.org
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to