On 04/04/2017 01:44 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: >> Hard to judge really - for a desktop/server system it probably doesn't >> matter - >> but for a typical embedded system ... > You are not forced to use busybox with libtirpc. You only need it > for NFS stuff. For modern NFS stack with rpcbind and nfs-utils you > need libtirpc anyway. Busybox just implements a mount helper which > could use internal uClibc RPC implementation. But in the end you > need libtirpc on the embedded device. > > So avoid busybox+libtirpc and use rpcbind+nfs-utils+libtirpc if you > require NFS on your device. > > I still see no real use case for the old internal RPC > implementation on a modern embedded device.
Right as I mentioned in my first post, I'm not arguing for/against, I'm just sharing an observation, which was subtle when I first ran into it ! This might not matter in the grand scheme of things ! -Vineet _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
