Hi Waldemar, On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 06:31 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi, > > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS > before doing it. > > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough. > > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default. > > Attached is a patch. > > Any comments?
Looks good to me, thought maybe Vineet has another opinion on that. -Alexey _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
