Hey Jim,

I took a while to respond because I was verifying my answer:

(1) The current seL4 CAmkES VMM supports multiple concurrent guests on x86, but 
it doesn't support multiple concurrent guests on ARM. it sounds like you care 
very strongly about airtight isolation between the guests, but our current 
CAmkES VMM does not provide this.

(2) If you would like to have multiple guests with their own NICs, you can 
either:
(2a) Use our Virt-IO Network support, and have the VMM expose a VirtIO-NIC to 
each of your guests, then have the VMM relay frames sent over the virtio-NIC 
devices down to a "real" NIC device on the host. It is very likely that you 
will have to write a new driver for the host NIC you wish to relay the frames 
out to.
(2b) If your host machine has multiple NICs, you can expose one NIC each to 
each guest and pass them through as PCI devices: we support presenting fake PCI 
devices to guests. However this is not "automated", in the sense that you will 
have to manually select the host NICs you want to expose to the guests, then 
manually do a PCI bus scan on your target host machine to find out their MMIO 
ranges, IRQs and IO-ports, and then manually describe those to the VMM ((i) 
Tell CAmkES where these resources are so that the untypeds get passed through 
to some designated component and (ii) manually tell the VMM to present a PCI 
device to each guest, explaining to it what BARs to present to each guest).

(3) Your phrasing implies strongly that you need very strong isolation as part 
of your mission, but the current CAmkES VMM was not designed to be completely 
airbag guests.

--
Kofi Doku Atuah
Kernel engineer
DATA61 | CSIRO

________________________________
From: Jim Marek <[email protected]>
Sent: 02 August 2018 10:01
To: Atuah, Kofi Doku (Data61, Kensington NSW)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [seL4] Question on multi-partition seL4 image/load for x86

A virtual machine.  Or a “container” that is able to be time and space isolated 
from from other containers.

I realize threads in seL4 are nearly as good as partitions in other OS, but I 
really want the strict isolation provided by a VM.  I am looking to operate it 
more like a type 1 hypervisor.

Jim

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 1, 2018, at 6:26 PM, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hey Jim,

Apologies, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "partition" in this 
context -- could you please clarify that for me?

--
Kofi Doku Atuah
Kernel engineer
DATA61 | CSIRO

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to