Ouch, and double ouch! Unsubscribe.. On Mar 6, 2015 9:16 AM, "Christian Stroetmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06.March.2015 17:57, Tim Newsham wrote: > > Tim, hopefully I do not have to understand your email as the beginning of > the bashing. > > So making it clear, I have not said that it is already patented. I said > that some features "may be inventions and hence are covered by the United > States [Patent Law]", and that they are in the patenting phase. > Before you can be smart and find it under my name or a name of another > entity you have to wait some time around 18 to 24 months. > > Please, read my information carefully and then ask a lawyer what this > means. > > > > Regards > Christian Stroetmann > > Hi Christian, A patent search at uspto.com with your name turned up >> nothing. Which patent numbers are you referencing? >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Christian Stroetmann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 06.March.2015 05:39, Raoul Duke wrote: >>> >>>> wouldn't provide you much. What sel4 could buy >>>>> you is isolation between mysql and other applications >>>>> if you chose to run several processes on the same >>>>> machine. The processes themselves, including mysql, >>>>> would still be vulnerable to any internal vulnerabilities >>>>> they might have (sel4 is not a magic bullet). >>>>> >>>> There's a lot of noise around Docker. I find it annoying for many >>>> reasons, including security -- although I do understand some of the >>>> attraction. It would be super keen in my mind if seL4 could offer >>>> something in that vein, could present itself as a nice alternative. >>>> >>>> Hello >>> >>> I only waited for these steps, so I simply quote the related >>> informations: >>> "Please, bear in mind that some features of OntoLix and OntoLinux may be >>> inventions and hence are covered by the United States Code Title 35 - >>> Patents. For example, applying of (object-)capability based security for >>> a >>> complete software stack consisting of an operating system kernel layer >>> with >>> a microkernel or a hybrid kernel and an application layer, and for a >>> container of a (union mount based) software deployment system should be >>> considered as having the status of inventions that are protected under >>> patent laws." >>> >>> And before the usual bashing begins I would like to add that it is only >>> in >>> the patending phase, because I am annoyed of the situation that nobody in >>> the open source and scientifc communities wants to reference the original >>> sources correctly since more than 8 years now. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Christian Stroetmann >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
