@@ -166,7 +171,6 @@ static bool ploop_try_delay_enospc(struct ploop_rq *prq, 
struct pio *pio)
        bool delayed = true;
        unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
        if (unlikely(ploop->wants_suspend)) {
                delayed = false;
                goto unlock;
@@ -176,10 +180,11 @@ static bool ploop_try_delay_enospc(struct ploop_rq *prq, 
struct pio *pio)
pr_err_once(PL_FMT("underlying disk is almost full"),
                ploop_device_name(ploop));
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
        ploop->event_enospc = true;
-       list_add_tail(&pio->list, &ploop->enospc_pios);
-unlock:
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
+       llist_add((struct llist_node *)(&pio->list), &ploop->enospc_pios);
+unlock:
if (delayed)
                mod_timer(&ploop->enospc_timer, jiffies + PLOOP_ENOSPC_TIMEOUT);

Can you please explain why we need to take defered_lock around ploop->event_enospc setting after your patch? (It looks that this lock does not do anything now.)


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to