On 17.01.25 10:23, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
Seems like an excess patch (leads to double ploop_pio_endio), as the
only caller of ploop_data_pio_end already does:
Agree, dropped
if (pio->is_data_alloc) {
completed = ploop_data_pio_end(pio);
if (!completed)
return;
}
ploop_pio_endio(pio);
On 12/6/24 05:56, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
Fix a bug in ploop_data_pio_end.
If piwb is already completed, which can happen if we attach
a flush pio to it, pio is not added to the list and ploop_pio_endio
is never called on it. This results in a hang since pio is never
completed.
Avoid this by calling ploop_pio_endio directly in case piwb is
already completed.
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-91821
Signed-off-by: Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atana...@virtuozzo.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c b/drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c
index 6192ddca3693..276e8cf3b178 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c
@@ -1204,6 +1204,9 @@ static bool ploop_data_pio_end(struct pio *pio)
else if (!pio->bi_status)
pio->bi_status = piwb->bi_status;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&piwb->lock, flags);
+ /* If pio is late then end it here. this can happen with flushes */
+ if (completed)
+ ploop_pio_endio(pio);
ploop_put_piwb(piwb);
--
Regards,
Alexander Atanasov
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
