This version of check_zero is the same on non-zero areas,
but ~2 times faster on zero areas. Though benchmark was
done in userspace, memcmp may be different there

It is strange. Linux should provide a good function doing this.
Did I miss it?

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuz...@acronis.com>
---
 fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_cs_accel.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_cs_accel.c b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_cs_accel.c
index a76f28e..fc6a35f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_cs_accel.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_cs_accel.c
@@ -278,13 +278,10 @@ static int verify_crc(struct pcs_int_request * ireq, u32 
* crc)
 static int check_zero(struct page * page, unsigned int offset)
 {
        u64 * addr = kmap(page) + offset;
-       int i;
 
-       for (i = 0; i < 512/8; i++) {
-               if (likely(addr[i] != 0)) {
-                       kunmap(page);
-                       return 0;
-               }
+        if (likely(addr[0] || memcmp(addr, addr + 1, 512 - 8))) {
+               kunmap(page);
+                return 0;
        }
        kunmap(page);
        return 1;
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to