Use correct lock to protect the kill_requests operation on all request
queues. Test of the FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY bit needs to be done with
corresponding lock to prevent new requests being added to a queue after
it has been killed.

Adjust the order of queues that kill_request operation is performed as
following:

bg_queue -> [ kio queues ] -> input queue -> process queue.

This follows the order that a fuse request could be moved around among
queues. The most import part is that the bg_queue needs to be killed
first because otherwise requests from it could be flushed to input queue
after the input queue has been killed.

Signed-off-by: Liu Kui <kui....@acronis.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuz...@acronis.com>
---
 fs/fuse/inode.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index 91b5591..c377700 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -512,15 +512,14 @@ int fuse_invalidate_files(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 
nodeid)
 
        fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
 
+       /* Mark that invalidate files is in progress */
        spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+       set_bit(FUSE_I_INVAL_FILES, &fi->state);
        list_for_each_entry(ff, &fi->rw_files, rw_entry) {
                set_bit(FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY, &ff->ff_state);
        }
        spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
 
-       /* Mark that invalidate files is in progress */
-       set_bit(FUSE_I_INVAL_FILES, &fi->state);
-
        /* let them see FUSE_S_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY */
        wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
 
@@ -528,24 +527,38 @@ int fuse_invalidate_files(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 
nodeid)
        if (!err || err == -EIO) { /* AS_EIO might trigger -EIO */
                struct fuse_dev *fud;
                spin_lock(&fc->lock);
+
+               /*
+                * Clean bg_queue first to prevent requests being flushed
+                * to an input queue after it has been cleaned .
+                */
+               spin_lock(&fc->bg_lock);
+               fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fc->bg_queue);
+               spin_unlock(&fc->bg_lock);
+
+               if (fc->kio.op && fc->kio.op->kill_requests)
+                       fc->kio.op->kill_requests(fc, inode);
+
+               spin_lock(&fc->main_iq.lock);
+               fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fc->main_iq.pending);
+               spin_unlock(&fc->main_iq.lock);
+
                list_for_each_entry(fud, &fc->devices, entry) {
                        struct fuse_pqueue *fpq = &fud->pq;
                        struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = fud->fiq;
                        int i;
+
+                       spin_lock(&fiq->lock);
+                       fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fiq->pending);
+                       spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
+
                        spin_lock(&fpq->lock);
                        for (i = 0; i < FUSE_PQ_HASH_SIZE; i++)
                                fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, 
&fpq->processing[i]);
                        fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fpq->io);
                        spin_unlock(&fpq->lock);
 
-                       spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
-                       fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fiq->pending);
-                       spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
                }
-               fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fc->main_iq.pending);
-               fuse_kill_requests(fc, inode, &fc->bg_queue);
-               if (fc->kio.op && fc->kio.op->kill_requests)
-                       fc->kio.op->kill_requests(fc, inode);
 
                wake_up(&fi->page_waitq); /* readpage[s] can wait on fuse wb */
                spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to