On 8/21/23 14:07, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
On 16.08.23 12:32, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
Add new function to target_type, so any dm devices may realize it
Implement intermediate llseek_hole() on device-mapper layer, do some simple
checks.

Feature: dm: implement SEEK_HOLE for dm-qcow2 and dm-ploop
https://jira.vzint.dev/browse/PSBM-145746
Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadche...@virtuozzo.com>

---
v2: fix return and goto inconsistency

  drivers/md/dm.c               | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/device-mapper.h |  4 ++++
  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 7e5c61a75eeb..d592c023b090 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -484,6 +484,45 @@ static int dm_blk_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
      return r;
  }
+static loff_t dm_llseek_hole(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t offset, int whence)
+{
+    struct mapped_device *md = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+    struct dm_table *table;
+    struct dm_target *ti;
+    int srcu_idx;
+    loff_t ret;
+
+    table = dm_get_live_table(md, &srcu_idx);
+    if (!table || !dm_table_get_size(table))
+        return -ENOTTY;
+
+    /*
+     * For now we only support devices that have a single target.
+     * But probably it is not hard to break it to a few requests to a different
+     * targets
+     */
+    if (table->num_targets != 1)
+        return -EOPNOTSUPP;


multipath, tracking and push_backup are all possible targets (that get used) so any combination can increase the count - shouldn't this be TODO?

Maybe I am mistaken, but I always thought that table->num_targets is amount of targets within single device. e.g. linear dm made by two devices concatenation will have two as the number of targets. And I think dm-ploop and dm-qcow2 num targets is always one, at least for now


+    ti = dm_table_get_target(table, 0);
+
+    if (dm_suspended_md(md)) {
+        ret = -EAGAIN;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    if (!ti->type->llseek_hole) {
+        ret = -EINVAL;

EOPNOTSUPP - may be swap with num_targets != 1 error - which will be EINVAL due to the argument - while here it is not supported - not an issue with the arguments ?

-EINVAL is here to preserve default SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE behavior with block devices. Previously fixed_size_llseek() was called in all cases and returned -EINVAL when seeking holes or data. So dm devices without llseek_hole implementation should return this value too.

The same comment goes for 3/8 patch.


+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    ret = ti->type->llseek_hole(ti, offset, whence);
+
+out:
+    dm_put_live_table(md, srcu_idx);
+    return ret;
+}
+
  u64 dm_start_time_ns_from_clone(struct bio *bio)
  {
      return jiffies_to_nsecs(clone_to_tio(bio)->io->start_time);
@@ -3255,6 +3294,7 @@ static const struct block_device_operations dm_blk_dops = {
      .getgeo = dm_blk_getgeo,
      .report_zones = dm_blk_report_zones,
      .pr_ops = &dm_pr_ops,
+    .llseek_hole = &dm_llseek_hole,

Why &dm_llseek_hole and not just dm_llseek_hole - like the other function assignments?

      .owner = THIS_MODULE
  };
@@ -3264,6 +3304,7 @@ static const struct block_device_operations dm_rq_blk_dops = {
      .ioctl = dm_blk_ioctl,
      .getgeo = dm_blk_getgeo,
      .pr_ops = &dm_pr_ops,
+    .llseek_hole = &dm_llseek_hole,

ditto


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to