Hello! On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 3:14 PM Kui Liu <kui....@acronis.com> wrote: > How about use WARN_ONCE() just in case to catch any unexpected changes in > the future?
For now it is completely our internal thing. We could even drop iter at all to avoid any surprizes. But this would be not reasonable, see below. > BTW, do you think we need to replace iov_iter_get_pages() in > do_recv_one_seg() with similar implementation? No, we do not pass the result anywhere. Yet we could try to live more dangerously and efficiently. Network might be ready to accept generic iter, we could use sock_recvmsg() instead of spltting it to multiple kernel_recvmsg, which could make this code more efficient. It is to be measured though, profit could be not enough. Also I have no idea who uses this path, it might be just broken. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
