1) how about rh6?
2) how about spin_unlock(lock) ?
On 19.05.2015 17:43, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Double loop is here, "break works is not as expected".
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@odin.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index 532edea..0e990c2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ void tcp_v4_kill_ve_sockets(struct ve_struct *envid)
> retry = 1;
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> sock_put(sk);
> - break;
> + goto enable_bh;
> }
> /* sk might have disappeared from the hash
> before
> * we got the lock */
> @@ -2893,6 +2893,7 @@ void tcp_v4_kill_ve_sockets(struct ve_struct *envid)
> }
> spin_unlock(lock);
> }
> +enable_bh:
> local_bh_enable();
> if (retry) {
> schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ);
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
