On 03/10/2012 12:39 AM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal<[email protected]> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index e6fd558..6fbb438 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); static void memcg_kmem_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent); +static void memcg_kmem_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); static inline bool mem_cgroup_test_flag(const struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum memcg_flags flag) @@ -3700,6 +3701,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool free_all) int ret; int node, zid, shrink; int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES; + unsigned long usage; struct cgroup *cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup; css_get(&memcg->css); @@ -3719,6 +3721,8 @@ move_account: /* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */ lru_add_drain_all(); drain_all_stock_sync(memcg); + if (!free_all) + memcg_kmem_move(memcg);
Any reason we're not moving kmem charges when free_all is set as well? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
