Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbur...@parallels.com> writes: > 19.12.2011 20:37, Eric W. Biederman пишет: >> Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbur...@parallels.com> writes: >> >> Doing that independently of the rest of the sysctls is pretty horrible >> and confusing to users. What I am planning might suit your needs and >> if not we need to talk some more about how to get the vfs to do >> something reasonable. >> > > Ok, Eric. Would be glad to discuss your sysctls plans. > But actually you already know my needs: I would like to make sysctls work in > the > way like sysfs does: i.e. content of files depends on mount maker - > not viewer.
What drives the desire to have sysctls depend on the mount maker? Especially what drives that desire not to have it have a /proc/<pid>/sys directory that reflects the sysctls for a given process. Eric _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
