Hi,
On 12/13/2011 01:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Glauber Costa <glom...@parallels.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:47:00 +0400
>
>> This series fixes all the few comments raised in the last round,
>> and seem to have acquired consensus from the memcg side.
>>
>> Dave, do you think it is acceptable now from the networking PoV?
>> In case positive, would you prefer merging this trough your tree,
>> or acking this so a cgroup maintainer can do it?
>
> All applied to net-next, thanks.
now there are plenty of compiler-warnings when CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set:
In file included from include/linux/tcp.h:211:0,
from include/linux/ipv6.h:221,
from include/net/ip_vs.h:23,
from kernel/sysctl_binary.c:6:
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared
inside parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: its scope is only this definition or
declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:67:57: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside
parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup_subsys’ declared
inside parameter list [enabled by default]
include/net/sock.h:68:61: warning: ‘struct cgroup’ declared inside
parameter list [enabled by default]
Because struct cgroup is only declared if CONFIG_CGROUPS is enabled.
(cfr. linux/cgroup.h)
Christoph
--
Christoph Paasch
PhD Student
IP Networking Lab --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be
MultiPath TCP in the Linux Kernel --- http://mptcp.info.ucl.ac.be
Université Catholique de Louvain
--
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
