On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:22 +0300, Andrew Wagin wrote: > Hello Peter, > > 11 ноября 2011 г. 13:54 пользователь Andrew Vagin <[email protected]> написал: > > On 11/09/2011 03:55 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:54 +0300, Andrew Vagin wrote: > >>> > >>> This patch solves the following problem: > >>> > >>> Now some samples may be lost due to throttling. The number of samples is > >>> restricted by sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate/HZ. A trace event is > >>> divided on some samples according to event's period. I don't sure, that > >>> we should generate more than one sample on each trace event. I think the > >>> better way to use SAMPLE_PERIOD. > >> > >> It would be yes, but this code predates that, also it needs to work even > >> if the user doesn't provide SAMPLE_PERIOD. > > I have not understood exactly what I should do now. > I'm going to send the third version of this patches. New version > contains only a small fix according with the comment for path 4/7. > In new version I am not going to fix the problem about which we > discussed early. I have some reasons for it:
I already merged your previous version, it can be found in tip. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
