On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:09:14 -0700
Greg Thelen <[email protected]> wrote:

> If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then
> balance_dirty_pages() will consider the memcg dirty limits
> as well as the system-wide limits.  This allows different
> cgroups to have distinct dirty limits which trigger direct
> and background writeback at different levels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

Ideally, I think some comments in the code for "why we need double-check 
system's
dirty limit and memcg's dirty limit" will be appreciated.


_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to