Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]> writes:
>
>>>> Yet another set of per-namespace IDs along with CLONE_NEWXXX ones?
>>>> I currently have a way to create all namespaces we have with one
>>>> syscall. Why don't we have an ability to enter them all with one syscall?
>>> The CLONE_NEWXXX series of bits has been an royal pain to work with,
>>> and it appears to be unnecessary complications for no gain.
>> That's the answer for the "Yet another set..." question.
>> How about the "Why don't we have..." one?
>
> I am not certain which question you are asking:
>
> Why don't we have an ability to enter all namespaces with one syscall
> invocation?
That's how I understood the question, and I, too, wonder why not ?
By the way, an alternative to using bitmap is to change the prototype
of setns() to accept an array of FD's:
int setns(int *fds, int nfds);
So the process will atomically enter all the namespaces as specified
by the FDs.
Oren.
>
> Why don't we have a syscall that allows us to enter every namespace?
>
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
