* Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> 
> >> What does this patch actually do?  Is swapper currently excluded from 
> >> tracing for undisclosed reasons and this patch permits it to be traced? 
> >> If so, why was swapper thus excluded?  Or am I totally off track?
> >
> >> > +static struct pid * const ftrace_swapper_pid = (struct pid *)1;
> >> 
> >> eh?
> >
> > all side-effects of getting rid of the integer based PID namespace 
> > and replacing them with struct pid pointers.
> 
> Thanks for asking Andrew it looks like an unnecessary side effect.

Will wait for how the end result looks like ;-)

        Ingo
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to