Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Impact: clean up
>
> Use the new task struct trace flags to determine if a process should be
> traced or not.

Looks reasonable.

> Note: this moves the searching of the pid to the slow path of setting
> the pid field. This needs to be converted to the pid name space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index b17a303..c5049f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
>  int ftrace_enabled __read_mostly;
>  static int last_ftrace_enabled;
>  
> -/* ftrace_pid_trace >= 0 will only trace threads with this pid */
> +/* set when tracing only a pid */
>  static int ftrace_pid_trace = -1;
>  
>  /* Quick disabling of function tracer. */
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void ftrace_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long
> parent_ip)
>  
>  static void ftrace_pid_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
>  {
> -     if (current->pid != ftrace_pid_trace)
> +     if (!test_tsk_trace_trace(current))
>               return;
>  
>       ftrace_pid_function(ip, parent_ip);
> @@ -1714,11 +1714,33 @@ ftrace_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char __user
> *ubuf,
>               ftrace_pid_trace = -1;
>  
>       } else {
> +             struct task_struct *p;
> +             int found = 0;
>  
>               if (ftrace_pid_trace == val)
>                       goto out;
>  
> -             ftrace_pid_trace = val;
> +             /*
> +              * Find the task that matches this pid.
> +              * TODO: use pid namespaces instead.
> +              */
> +             rcu_read_lock();
> +             for_each_process(p) {
> +                     if (p->pid == val) {
> +                             found = 1;
> +                             set_tsk_trace_trace(p);
> +                     } else if (test_tsk_trace_trace(p))
> +                             clear_tsk_trace_trace(p);
> +             }
> +             rcu_read_unlock();

Yes.  This function you have just implemented inline is called find_pid.
It uses a hash lookup instead of an expensive walk trough all of the processes
in the system.  So the code becomes something like:


                do_each_pid_task(ftrace_pid_trace, PIDTYPE_PID, task) {
                        clear_tsk_trace_tace(p);
                } while_each_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID, task);
                put_pid(ftrace_pid_trace);

                ftrace_pid_trace = find_get_vpid(val);
                do_each_pid_task(ftrace_pid_trace, PIDTYPE_PID, task) {
                        set_tsk_trace_tace(p);
                } while_each_pid_task(ftrace_pid_trace, PIDTYPE_PID, task);

                if (!ftrace_pid_trace)
                        goto out;

The loops encompass both the test for validity, and handle the weird exec
case where the pid moves from one task to another.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to