On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 21:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:16:24 -0500 Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Impact: more efficient code for ftrace graph tracer
> >
> > This patch uses the dynamic patching, when available, to patch
> > the function graph code into the kernel.
> >
> > This patch will ease the way for letting both function tracing
> > and function graph tracing run together.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static int ftrace_mod_jmp(unsigned long ip,
> > + int old_offset, int new_offset)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char code[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
> > +
> > + if (probe_kernel_read(code, (void *)ip, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (code[0] != 0xe9 || old_offset != *(int *)(&code[1]))
>
> erk. I suspect that there's a nicer way of doing this amongst our
> forest of get_unaligned_foo() interfaces. Harvey will know.
>
if (code[0] != 0xe9 || old_offset != get_unaligned((int *)(&code[1])))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + *(int *)(&code[1]) = new_offset;
>
> Might be able to use put_unaligned_foo() here.
>
put_unaligned(new_offset, (int *)(&code[1]));
> The problem is that these functions use sizeof(*ptr) to work out what
> to do, so a cast is still needed. A get_unaligned32(ptr) would be
> nice. One which takes a void* and assumes CPU ordering.
I've been thinking similarly, I could investigate something that
goes in with the _noalign stuff?
I'll finish the documentation patch for the _noalign stuff and then see
about doing the host-order bits to fit in as well.
Harvey
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
