On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > True, though I don't think it's as simple as just enabling lockdep. My > understanding is you won't be able to determine if locks could ever be > taken out of order unless all of the cgroup systems are enabled and they > are all in the same cgroup hierarchy.
I wonder how hard it would be to extend lockdep to give a "signature" of locking operations from point A to point B? Then you could just compare a new subsystem with all existing subsystems without actually running with it. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
