> I guess you didn't notice this comment ? :)

Agghhh, you are right.
sorry.

> >> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> >> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> >> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> >> >  #include <linux/tty.h>
> >> >  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> >> >  #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> >> > +#include <linux/cgroup_task.h>
> >> >  
> >> >  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> >> >  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> >> > @@ -920,6 +921,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
> >> >                      p->user != current->nsproxy->user_ns->root_user)
> >> >                          goto bad_fork_free;
> >> >          }
> >> > +        if (task_cgroup_can_fork(p))
> >> > +                goto bad_fork_free;
> > 
> > If task_cgroup_can_fork() returns 0, but copy_process() fails afterwords,
> > taskcg->nr_tasks will be in a wrong state.

Sure.
I'll fix it, of cource.

Thanks!



_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to