Yo Hal! On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:57:40 -0700 Hal Murray via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> Is anybdy familiar with this area?
> Is this something I did? Or are others seeing the same problem?
> (I might have turned on some more-warnings flag, but I don't think
> so.)
>
> ../../tests/unity/unity.c:984:5: warning: enumeration value
> \u2018UNITY_FLOAT_INVALID_TRAIT\u2019 not handled in switch
> [-Wswitch-enum] ../../tests/unity/unity.c:1124:5: warning:
> enumeration value \u2018UNITY_FLOAT_INVALID_TRAIT\u2019 not handled
> in switch [-Wswitch-enum]
That usually means there is no "default:" case in a switch.
> --------
>
> Speaking of warnings, some versions of OpenSSL and/or some compilers
> generate this:
>
> /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl/ssl.h:1491:53: warning: cast discards
> "const" qualifier from pointer target type [-Wcast-qual]
Simple, just a bad cast. But since it is in a system header, not easy
to fix.
> I've looked into it a bit and don't understand what's going on. I
> think our code is OK. This is passing a string literal through a
> maze of macros. I've decided not to spend much time on this since it
> doesn't happen with newer OpenSSL and/or compilers.
A string literal is (const char *), but you are passing that as a
(char *). Just be real sure that string is not modified by the called
function.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpVFcNe_S1_e.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
