Yo Hal! On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:59:03 -0800 Hal Murray via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> I think I've figured out part of what is going on. There is code
> that I think is trying to do the right thing with dates past 32 bits
> on systems with a 32 bit time_t.
>
> I'm assuming that is not an interesting case.
>
> I'm going to remove that code and pull the string to see how much
> other code I can remove.
Good for 64 bit time_t. Maybe wait a teensy bit longer for 64 bit
time_t to be everywhere.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpMdwcnMGGKG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
