rlaa...@wiktel.com said: > This is what you're thinking of (slightly trimmed): ...
Thanks. I wonder how long it would have taken me to find that. Gary said: > Basically, if the GPS reports more the 17 leap seconds, then the time has to > be aster 1 Jan 2017. Thanks. I assume the leap second tangle is so avoid breaking some very old test cases by bumping them into the current epoch. The code I was expecting doesn't know anything about leaps. It would be close to: while (t < PIVOT) t += 1024*7*86400 Where PIVOT would be the release date in seconds. ------ Are there any GPS units old enough to need to get bumped twice? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
