> > You are missing a key word in there. Listen "in addition" or "instead"? > > When I first read your message, I assumed you meant in addition since instead > doesn't really make sense to me. But maybe I'm missing something and > "instead" is what you have in mind. > > I really don't want to support listening on 2 ports as more than a temporary > hack. > > How about we go through steps 1, 2, and 3 with me just sending email when I > push the changes? If the RFC comes out first, we just skip to the end.
That makes more sense, do that instead. Thank you. ..m _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
