Gary E. Miller via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>: > > So there is nothing you recommend be merged at this time? > > I sorta wish NTPsec had a staging area like the Linux kernel does. > > There is value to a small and clean u-blox driver fully integrated > into NTPsec. But without KPPS it is inferior at timekeeping. > > If the guy that wrote it wanted to work on it under the NTPsec umbrella > that would be good. A little guidance and the guy that wrote that could > be very useful to NTPsec. > > Without that guy, or someone interested in being that guy. I'd pass on > that driver. I'm not personally interested in upgrading that software to > have the smarts that gpsd already does about the u-blox and KPPS.
I left an issue on his tracker about merging to upstream. If he responds
I will try to bring him into the fold. If he does not, from what you say there
os not much loss hrere.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
