Eric S. Raymond via devel writes: > If we don't see any evidence of beat-induced quantization, I'm willing > to say we drop this code.
Please don't invent gobbledeegok terminology. "Beat-induced quantization" is completely devoid of meaning. Again, what we're talking about is dithering and it is used to mask the error spurs from quantization. The reason for needing it is that the resolution of our measurement is in nanoseconds, while the actual granularity of the clock is larger than that. You will see it if you either use an original rasPi 1 (which only has microsecond clock resolution) or switch back to one of the old clock sources with coarse granularity on other architectures. Again, the first question is what these messages really mean. I don't remember seeing them on the rasPi at all, but I don't restart the daemons very often there. On my Intel machines I only see them just after having started the daemon and only one to three times. Which makes sense, since that's when the daemon needs to determine the clock granularity. It also converges to a system fuzz that conforms to my expectations about the clock used. So there's nothing wrong about that in this case. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
