James Browning via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> I would like to propose a new SHM implementation
The trouble with any new SHM proposal is that the underlayer is not
POSIX and we theefore can't count on it continuing to exist.
We need that kind of funcrionality, but any new design should be dome
over an IPC layer that's POSIX/SuSv2.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
