ntpd/refclock_gpsd.c has:
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
I see the following warning:
NetBSD:
../../ntpd/refclock_gpsd.c:2118:6: warning: implicit declaration of function
'strlcpy' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
FreeBSD:
../../ntpd/refclock_gpsd.c:2118:6: warning: implicit declaration of function
'strlcpy' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
strlcpy(pp->a_lastcode, tc, sizeof(pp->a_lastcode));
^
../../ntpd/refclock_gpsd.c:2118:6: warning: this function declaration is not a
prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
2 warnings generated.
I don't understand this area. My tests build without warnings when I comment
out that line.
I think somebody cleaned up that sort of #define a while ago. Did they forget
to remove this one?
----------
./libparse/clk_sel240x.c also references _XOPEN_SOURCE
#ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
#endif
My tests also build without that.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
