Yo Hal! On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:12:58 -0700 Hal Murray via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> > Why? Well, my IPv6 connections have much less latency and jitter
> > than my IPv4 ones. Without -4 and -6 on the NTP part of NTS I
> > can't make those comparisons easily.
>
> If you put the -4 after the "server", it does both the KE and NTP
> using -4.
>
> Is there a reason you need to do KE over one and NTP over the other?
We seem to be in an echo chamber, been here many times already:
1. testing
2. firewall avoiding. As demonstrated by the hackathon.
3. I see big differences in jitter and latency between IPv4 and IPv6.
I want to characterize the diffeence, then select the best.
> Implementation details:
I'll leave that to you the implementor.
> Just curious. What sort of setup are you using where IPv6 is
> significantly better than IPv4?
Beats me. All I can see is different paths using traceroute, mtr, etc.
Not unusual for ISPs and backbones to route IPv4 and IPv6 over different
hardware. They don't tell me why...
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp7O2AGPdWGI.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
