Yo Hal! On Fri, 01 Mar 2019 21:46:56 -0800 Hal Murray via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> Gary said:
> > Because that is the initial use case. If each ntpd had nts-ke in
> > it then there would be no need for such a complicated protocol.
>
> > The way Mark explained it to me, you want one NTS-KE per aisle, or
> > per rack. That limits the number of servers, with keys, that need
> > to be protected.
>
> Mark, would you please explain/expand. Thanks.
I think Achim answered this. Did his email make sense?
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp2HZ8kXKNgx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
