Eric said: >> I've been collecting major items in devel/TODO-NTS > Is there some reason this isn't just a section in nts.adoc? (Which may need > some GC at this point.) The whole idea of that document was to be a planning > whiteboard.
Only signal to noise. I was trying to capture the big ideas without getting bogged down in details. ---------- My big concern is that nobody else seems to be testing it. There may be dragons that I haven't poked. ---------- > Remember, I'm trying to get away from configure-time options. There is a fundamental conflict between ease of use, ease of debugging, and good security. I don't know how to resolve that. Mostly, I was trying to raise the issue. Configure-time issues are just a detail. For Go, can we build 2 versions by linking in different modules? Has anybody looked at our configure time options? How many of them make sense in the context of Go? (ignore refclocks) -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
