Eric S. Raymond via devel writes: > If there's a good semantic reason to have a separate nts statement, I > can do that. But I don't presently know of one. A request for secure time > service has to reference an NTP server, yes?
The reason was that for NTS you do not talk to the NTP server, but to the NTS-KE instead. So there will be options that control the communication with the NTS-KE _only_ and other options that concern how to deal with the response. Only the latter part is in common with the current "server" machinery. Btw, "pool" is already a hybrid in the current config, so eventually getting rid of that confusion would probably help. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
