Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > I'm going to take this as direction to start by ripping out the interface
> > directive in ntp.conf; that's orthogonal to the rest of this mess because
> > it's restrictive and default behavior without it won't change.
>
> We should consider the timing on this. Do we want to do a release before you
> start breaking things?
I was planning to do and test the work in a branch, then rebase -i it
into a commit I can cherry-pick to the main branch any time we're
ready. It's not very important exctly when that happens. And this
plan is only plausible because removing the directive should be a
change with really good isolation, unlike some of the later ones.
> Maybe we should make a plan with a list of changes that all have to get done
> before we can do another release.
I want to do a triage pass over the bug list. That's about it.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
