> We could kill the interface command, and let the usual syntax error happen. > Or we could raise a special syntax error, calling out the need to use the > packet filter instead. Then the question becomes, is it a warn-and-continue, > or a error-and-halt?
Error and halt. (or set a flag to halt after the rest of the parsing) This is a security issue. We don't want to let evil packets in. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
