On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 10:22:25PM -0700, Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > While looking at some code, I noticed several symbols that are sometimes > protected with an ifdef and sometimes assumed to exist. > > I think they are all required by POSIX, and thus the ifdefs are not needed. > > Is there any simple way to verify that a symbol is required by POSIX, and/or > the parts of POSIX we require? > > Any reason I don't get rid of the ifdefs?
Hey Hal, I see O_NONBLOCK and O_NOCTTY referenced on http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html I haven't yet found TIOCMGET mentioned in the POSIX spec. Cheers, -Matt _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
