> On most systems this will do the right thing. Which systems don't work right and/or what are we supposed to do there?
> I have implemented and tested this solution, along with full documentation > and packaging guidance. I think the documentation needs more work in this area. A separate file may be appropriate. Where does FHS think we should install out code? Why? Are there 2 cases? Developer mode and packaging for system distribution? --------- Comments on packaging/packaging.txt > == ntp.conf installation = > The reason this is so is that NTPsec does not yet have an authorized > pool group of its own. This may change in the future. Even if we have a pool group, I don't think we should smash an existing ntp.conf I think a warning message would be better than installing a default. > Python librarty typo - no "t" in library -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
