Achim Gratz via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> Eric S. Raymond via devel writes:
> > I think the global pool name is a special case here. Why are they
> > advertising
> > that service if not to be used in exactly this way?
>
> No, I think their rule (and no, you don't get to redefine it) is that if
> you wanted to have a hardcoded/default pool association you'd have to
> ask them for an ntpsec pool. That might be a possibility, but probably
> not an immediate one.
It may be moot anyway. Thinking about it, I've become increasingly
uncomfortable with making that large a functional change this close to
release.
I think we'd better stick to bug fixes. And then maybe fast-cycle a 1.1,
like 90 days out or so.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
