> No, NTP doesn't do anything interesting here. The code predates the era > whend long double was standardized and generally available, a transition > that might have been as late as C99.
So it seems reasonable to assume that it's OK to run without the extra precision. The case I was worried about was where cleaning up that area we accidentally lost the precision. Do you (or Mark) have any opinions on whether I should push the fix? It pokes a tiny hole in the we-need-C99 position. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
