Yo Ian! On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:24:35 -0500 Ian Bruene <ianbru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I can tell from a cursory examination of the code the
> reason for this is so it can use the same bitmask #defines as the
> rest of the system. Is this correct? If so does that need to remain
> the case, if not then why is the complexity of a language bridge
> being maintained? If it has to stay this way the unit formatters
> *can* munch on the output of statustoa.
Many people would love the pymodule.c to go away. Just for starters:
It causes issues for dual Python2 and 3 systems.
> Related @anyone: is there a way to make ntpd produce a fake refclock
> for testing purposes?
Spend a few $$ and get a cheap USB GPS? Mark has some nice ones that
also send PPS.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpl5t7IluJNr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
