[email protected] said: > It seems wrong to me to invent a representation with that lind of limit when > struct timespec with 64-bit members is already standardized.
Your initial message was: > I disagree with Fred, because 292 years is way too short an era. That didn't have any qualifiers, but it raised an interesting issue. I was trying to explore the space rather than focus on this particular issue. > I think I can live with 292 billion years. :-) Each billion costs 30 bits. If the timespec worked out to 292 years would you put fixing that on our todo list? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
