g...@rellim.com said: > I like checks for things that can never happen. Somehow many of them > eventually do get tripped, then the error is more obvious, assuming a good > error message.
I do too, but there can be too much of a good thing. There is a real talent for putting in the right checks without adding too much clutter. That particular trap is very unlikely to go off. I'd be happy if the calls to that routine were changed to use the new code and a similar trap were installed over there. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
